The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 — published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. A voluntary, risk-based framework providing a common language for managing cybersecurity risk across organisations of all sizes and sectors. Version 2.0 introduces the Govern function and expands applicability beyond critical infrastructure.
6
Core Functions
22
Categories
106
Subcategories
26 Feb 2024
Publication Date
The Six Functions
CSF 2.0 is structured around six interconnected functions. The new Govern function underpins all others, establishing cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy. Together they cover the full lifecycle of cybersecurity risk management.
🛡
Govern (GV) — NEW in 2.0
Establish and monitor the organisation's cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy. The Govern function is cross-cutting and informs how the other five functions are implemented.
6 Categories • 32 Subcategories
🔎
Identify (ID)
Understand the organisation's current cybersecurity risks. Identify assets, business environment, governance, risk assessment, and risk management strategy to prioritise efforts.
3 Categories • 16 Subcategories
🔒
Protect (PR)
Use safeguards to manage the organisation's cybersecurity risks. Covers identity management, awareness training, data security, platform security, and technology infrastructure resilience.
5 Categories • 23 Subcategories
🚨
Detect (DE)
Find and analyse possible cybersecurity attacks and compromises. Continuous monitoring and analysis to identify anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse events.
2 Categories • 8 Subcategories
⚠
Respond (RS)
Take action regarding a detected cybersecurity incident. Incident management, analysis, mitigation, reporting, and communication activities to contain impact.
4 Categories • 14 Subcategories
🔄
Recover (RC)
Restore assets and operations affected by a cybersecurity incident. Recovery planning and execution, plus communications to support timely restoration.
2 Categories • 6 Subcategories
What Changed in CSF 2.0?
New Govern Function
The biggest change: a 6th function dedicated to governance, risk management strategy, roles and responsibilities, policy, oversight, and supply chain risk management. Governance was previously scattered across other functions.
Expanded Scope
CSF 2.0 explicitly applies to all organisations, not just critical infrastructure. The title dropped "Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity" and now applies to any organisation regardless of size or sector.
Supply Chain Focus
Cybersecurity supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) is now integrated into the Govern function (GV.SC) rather than being a standalone category, reflecting its growing importance.
Implementation Examples
NIST provides an online catalogue of Implementation Examples — concise, action-oriented steps for achieving each subcategory. These replace the old "informative references" as the primary guidance.
NIST CSF 2.0 vs. Other Frameworks
Aspect
NIST CSF 2.0
ISO 27001
NIS2
DORA
Type
Voluntary framework
Voluntary standard (certifiable)
EU Directive (binding)
EU Regulation (binding)
Scope
All organisations, all sectors
All organisations
18 critical sectors (EU)
Financial services (EU)
Structure
6 Functions, 22 Categories, 106 Subcategories
93 Annex A controls, 4 themes
46 Articles, 5 pillars
64 Articles, 5 pillars
Governance
Dedicated Govern function (new in 2.0)
Management commitment clause
Art. 20 management liability
Art. 5 management body
Risk Tiers
4 Implementation Tiers
Risk-based ISMS
Essential vs Important
Proportionality principle
Enforcement
None (voluntary)
Certification audit
Fines up to EUR 10M / 2%
Fines per national law
The Six Functions — Deep Dive
Select a function from the sidebar or filter below to focus on a specific domain.
Govern (GV) — NEW in CSF 2.0
The Govern function establishes and monitors the organisation's cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy. It is cross-cutting — it informs how all five other functions are implemented. Govern addresses organisational context, risk management strategy, roles/responsibilities/authorities, policy, oversight, and cybersecurity supply chain risk management.
Govern Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
GV.OC — Organisational Context
The circumstances — mission, stakeholder expectations, dependencies, legal/regulatory/contractual requirements — surrounding the organisation's cybersecurity risk management decisions are understood
5
GV.RM — Risk Management Strategy
The organisation's priorities, constraints, risk tolerance and appetite statements, and assumptions are established, communicated, and used to support operational risk decisions
7
GV.RR — Roles, Responsibilities & Authorities
Cybersecurity roles, responsibilities, and authorities to foster accountability, performance assessment, and continuous improvement are established and communicated
4
GV.PO — Policy
Organisational cybersecurity policy is established, communicated, and enforced
2
GV.OV — Oversight
Results of organisation-wide cybersecurity risk management activities and performance are used to inform, improve, and adjust the risk management strategy
Cyber supply chain risk management processes are identified, established, managed, monitored, and improved by organisational stakeholders
10
Security Engineer Takeaway: The Govern function is the most significant addition in CSF 2.0. It elevates governance from a checkbox to a first-class function. For security teams, this means: (1) formal risk management strategy with documented risk appetite, (2) clear roles and authorities for cybersecurity, (3) board-level oversight with measurable outcomes, and (4) supply chain risk management integrated into governance. Use GV to justify programme investment and board engagement — it's now a core function, not an afterthought.
Identify (ID)
The Identify function helps develop an organisational understanding to manage cybersecurity risk to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities. Understanding the business context, the resources that support critical functions, and the related cybersecurity risks enables an organisation to focus and prioritise its efforts.
Identify Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
ID.AM — Asset Management
Assets (data, hardware, software, systems, facilities, services, people) that enable the organisation to achieve business purposes are identified and managed consistent with their relative importance to organisational objectives and risk strategy
8
ID.RA — Risk Assessment
The cybersecurity risk to the organisation, assets, and individuals is understood
6
ID.IM — Improvement
Improvements to organisational cybersecurity risk management processes, procedures, and activities are identified across all CSF Functions
3
Security Engineer Takeaway: You can't protect what you don't know about. ID.AM (Asset Management) should be your first priority — maintain a comprehensive, up-to-date asset inventory including hardware, software, cloud services, data stores, and third-party dependencies. ID.RA feeds your risk register: conduct regular risk assessments and update them after significant changes or incidents. The new ID.IM category formalises continuous improvement across the entire framework.
Protect (PR)
The Protect function outlines appropriate safeguards to ensure delivery of critical services. It supports the ability to limit or contain the impact of a potential cybersecurity event. In CSF 2.0, Protect is reorganised into five categories covering identity management, awareness, data security, platform security, and technology infrastructure resilience.
Protect Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
PR.AA — Identity Management, Authentication & Access Control
Access to physical and logical assets is limited to authorised users, services, and hardware and managed commensurate with the assessed risk of unauthorised access
6
PR.AT — Awareness & Training
The organisation's personnel are provided cybersecurity awareness and training so they can perform their cybersecurity-related duties
2
PR.DS — Data Security
Data are managed consistent with the organisation's risk strategy to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information
10
PR.PS — Platform Security
The hardware, software, and services of physical and virtual platforms are managed consistent with the organisation's risk strategy to protect their confidentiality, integrity, and availability
6
PR.IR — Technology Infrastructure Resilience
Security architectures are managed with the organisation's risk strategy to protect asset confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and organisational resilience
4
Security Engineer Takeaway: Protect is where most of your technical controls live. Key priorities: (1) PR.AA — implement MFA for all privileged access, enforce least-privilege, and deploy zero-trust architecture principles. (2) PR.DS — encrypt data at rest and in transit, implement DLP. (3) PR.PS — harden platforms, manage configurations, maintain secure baselines. (4) PR.IR — design for resilience with redundancy, failover, and backup strategies. The new PR.PS category consolidates what was previously scattered across multiple categories.
Detect (DE)
The Detect function enables timely discovery of cybersecurity events. It defines the appropriate activities to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event. In CSF 2.0, Detect is streamlined to two categories: continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis.
Detect Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
DE.CM — Continuous Monitoring
Assets are monitored to find anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse events
9
DE.AE — Adverse Event Analysis
Anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse events are analysed to characterise the events and detect cybersecurity incidents
8
Security Engineer Takeaway: Detect is your SOC's domain. DE.CM requires continuous monitoring across networks, endpoints, physical access, and personnel activity. Deploy SIEM, EDR, NDR, and UEBA tools. DE.AE is about turning raw alerts into actionable intelligence — correlate events, validate alerts, reduce false positives, and integrate threat intelligence. The mean time to detect (MTTD) is your key metric here. CSF 2.0 emphasises that detection must be continuous, not periodic.
Respond (RS)
The Respond function supports the ability to contain the impact of a cybersecurity incident. It includes incident management, analysis, mitigation, reporting, and communication activities. In CSF 2.0, Respond is reorganised into four categories.
Respond Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
RS.MA — Incident Management
Responses to detected cybersecurity incidents are managed
5
RS.AN — Incident Analysis
Investigations are conducted to ensure effective response and support forensics and recovery activities
3
RS.CO — Incident Response Reporting & Communication
Response activities are coordinated with internal and external stakeholders as required by laws, regulations, or policies
3
RS.MI — Incident Mitigation
Activities are performed to prevent expansion of an event and mitigate its effects
2
Security Engineer Takeaway: Respond is your incident response playbook in framework form. RS.MA covers the end-to-end IR process: triage, escalation, containment, eradication, and post-incident review. RS.AN is about root cause analysis and forensic investigation. RS.CO now explicitly includes regulatory reporting requirements (NIS2, DORA, GDPR) — build this into your IR playbooks. RS.MI focuses on containment actions: network isolation, account disablement, and threat eradication. Test your IR plan with regular tabletop exercises and purple team engagements.
Recover (RC)
The Recover function supports timely return to normal operations to reduce the impact of a cybersecurity incident. It ensures that recovery plans are executed and communications support restoration efforts. In CSF 2.0, Recover has two categories.
Recover Categories
Click any row for detailed context, subcategories, and external references.
Category
Description
Subcategories
RC.RP — Incident Recovery Plan Execution
Restoration activities are performed to ensure operational availability of systems and services affected by cybersecurity incidents
6
RC.CO — Incident Recovery Communication
Restoration activities are coordinated with internal and external parties
4
Security Engineer Takeaway: Recovery is where your business continuity and disaster recovery plans are executed. RC.RP covers restoring systems from backups, rebuilding compromised infrastructure, and validating restoration integrity. Key metric: Recovery Time Objective (RTO). RC.CO ensures stakeholders (customers, regulators, partners, public) are informed about recovery progress. Test your recovery procedures regularly — especially restoring from immutable backups after a ransomware scenario. Your backup strategy must include offline/air-gapped copies tested at least quarterly.
Category Explorer
All 22 categories of CSF 2.0, grouped by function. Click to expand details, subcategories, and practical security notes.
Govern (GV) — 6 Categories
GV.OCOrganisational ContextCore▶
The circumstances surrounding the organisation's cybersecurity risk management decisions are understood. This includes mission, stakeholder expectations, and dependencies.
Key Subcategories
GV.OC-01: The organisational mission is understood and informs cybersecurity risk management
GV.OC-02: Internal and external stakeholders are understood, and their needs and expectations regarding cybersecurity risk management are understood and considered
GV.OC-03: Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity — including privacy and civil liberties obligations — are understood and managed
GV.OC-04: Critical objectives, capabilities, and services that external stakeholders depend on or expect are understood and communicated
GV.OC-05: Outcomes, capabilities, and services that the organisation depends on are understood and communicated
Security Engineer Takeaway: GV.OC is about knowing why you exist and what you're protecting. Map your critical business services, understand regulatory obligations (NIS2, DORA, GDPR, sector-specific regulations), and identify dependencies on external providers. This context drives risk appetite and prioritisation for everything else in the framework.
The organisation's priorities, constraints, risk tolerance and appetite statements, and assumptions are established, communicated, and used to support operational risk decisions.
Key Subcategories
GV.RM-01: Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organisational stakeholders
GV.RM-02: Risk appetite and risk tolerance statements are established, communicated, and maintained
GV.RM-03: Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
GV.RM-04: Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
GV.RM-05: Lines of communication across the organisation are established for cybersecurity risks, including risks from suppliers and other third parties
GV.RM-06: A standardised method for calculating, documenting, categorising, and prioritising cybersecurity risks is established and communicated
GV.RM-07: Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterised and are included in organisational cybersecurity risk discussions
Security Engineer Takeaway: This is where you document your risk appetite. "We accept no more than X hours of downtime for critical services" or "We will not accept risks rated above Y without explicit board approval." Make risk tolerance actionable, not aspirational. Integrate cybersecurity risks into your enterprise risk register and ensure risk communication flows both up (to the board) and down (to operational teams).
Cybersecurity roles, responsibilities, and authorities to foster accountability, performance assessment, and continuous improvement are established and communicated.
Key Subcategories
GV.RR-01: Organisational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture of cybersecurity risk awareness
GV.RR-02: Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
GV.RR-03: Adequate resources are allocated commensurate with the cybersecurity risk strategy, roles, responsibilities, and policies
GV.RR-04: Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
Security Engineer Takeaway: Ensure the CISO has a clear mandate, adequate budget, and direct reporting line to senior leadership. GV.RR-01 explicitly states leadership must be "responsible and accountable" — use this to push for board-level cybersecurity governance. GV.RR-04 means security in hiring (background checks), onboarding (security awareness), and offboarding (access revocation).
GV.POPolicyImportant▶
Organisational cybersecurity policy is established, communicated, and enforced.
Key Subcategories
GV.PO-01: Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organisational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
GV.PO-02: Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organisational mission
Security Engineer Takeaway: Policies must be living documents, not shelf-ware. Review annually at minimum, and update after significant incidents, organisational changes, or new regulations. Make sure policies are communicated effectively (not just posted on an intranet nobody reads) and that enforcement mechanisms exist (monitoring, auditing, consequences for non-compliance).
GV.OVOversightImportant▶
Results of organisation-wide cybersecurity risk management activities and performance are used to inform, improve, and adjust the risk management strategy.
Key Subcategories
GV.OV-01: Cybersecurity risk management strategy outcome is reviewed to inform and adjust strategy and direction
GV.OV-02: The cybersecurity risk management strategy is reviewed and adjusted to ensure coverage of organisational requirements and risks
GV.OV-03: Organisational cybersecurity risk management performance is evaluated and reviewed for adjustments needed
Security Engineer Takeaway: Oversight means measuring outcomes, not just activities. Establish KPIs: mean time to detect, mean time to respond, patch compliance rates, training completion, risk reduction over time. Report these to leadership quarterly and use the data to adjust strategy. If your MTTD is 200 days, your strategy needs adjusting regardless of how many tools you have deployed.
Cyber supply chain risk management processes are identified, established, managed, monitored, and improved by organisational stakeholders.
Key Subcategories
GV.SC-01: A cybersecurity supply chain risk management programme, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organisational stakeholders
GV.SC-02: Cybersecurity roles and responsibilities for suppliers, customers, and partners are established, communicated, and coordinated internally and externally
GV.SC-03: Cybersecurity supply chain risk management is integrated into cybersecurity and enterprise risk management, risk assessment, and improvement processes
GV.SC-04: Suppliers are known and prioritised by criticality
GV.SC-05: Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritised, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
GV.SC-06: Planning and due diligence are conducted to reduce risks before entering into formal supplier or other third-party relationships
GV.SC-07: The risks posed by a supplier, their products and services, and other third parties are understood, recorded, prioritised, assessed, responded to, and monitored over the course of the relationship
GV.SC-08: Relevant suppliers and other third parties are included in incident planning, response, and recovery activities
GV.SC-09: Supply chain security practices are integrated into cybersecurity and enterprise risk management programmes, and their performance is monitored throughout the technology product and service life cycle
GV.SC-10: Cybersecurity supply chain risk management plans include provisions for activities that occur after the conclusion of a partnership or service agreement
Security Engineer Takeaway: GV.SC is the most expanded area in CSF 2.0 with 10 subcategories. This reflects the increasing reality that your security posture is only as strong as your weakest supplier. Key actions: (1) inventory all suppliers by criticality, (2) include security requirements in contracts, (3) conduct due diligence before onboarding, (4) include suppliers in your IR plans, (5) plan for supplier exit/transition. Align with NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) and DORA Art. 28–30 if those regulations apply to you.
Assets that enable the organisation to achieve business purposes are identified and managed consistent with their relative importance to organisational objectives and risk strategy.
Key Subcategories
ID.AM-01: Inventories of hardware managed by the organisation are maintained
ID.AM-02: Inventories of software, services, and systems managed by the organisation are maintained
ID.AM-03: Representations of the organisation's authorised network communication and internal and external network data flows are maintained
ID.AM-04: Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
ID.AM-05: Assets are prioritised based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission
ID.AM-07: Inventories of data and corresponding metadata for designated data types are maintained
ID.AM-08: Systems, hardware, software, services, and data are managed throughout their life cycles
Security Engineer Takeaway: Asset management is foundational. You cannot protect assets you don't know about. Maintain automated discovery tools (network scanners, CMDB, cloud asset inventories), classify assets by criticality, and track lifecycle from procurement to decommissioning. The new ID.AM-07 on data inventories is critical for data governance and privacy compliance.
ID.RARisk AssessmentCore▶
The cybersecurity risk to the organisation, assets, and individuals is understood.
Key Subcategories
ID.RA-01: Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
ID.RA-02: Cyber threat intelligence is received from information sharing forums and sources
ID.RA-03: Internal and external threats to the organisation are identified and recorded
ID.RA-04: Potential impacts and likelihoods of threats exploiting vulnerabilities are identified and recorded
ID.RA-05: Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts are used to understand inherent risk and inform risk response prioritisation
ID.RA-06: Risk responses are chosen, prioritised, planned, tracked, and communicated
Security Engineer Takeaway: Run vulnerability scans continuously, not just quarterly. Integrate threat intelligence (MITRE ATT&CK, ISACs, commercial feeds) into your risk assessments. Use a consistent risk scoring methodology (CVSS for vulnerabilities, a qualitative/quantitative risk matrix for broader risks). Document risk responses: accept, mitigate, transfer, or avoid — and track them to closure.
ID.IMImprovementStandard▶
Improvements to organisational cybersecurity risk management processes, procedures, and activities are identified across all CSF Functions.
Key Subcategories
ID.IM-01: Improvements are identified from evaluations
ID.IM-02: Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
ID.IM-03: Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes
Security Engineer Takeaway: New in CSF 2.0, ID.IM formalises continuous improvement. After every incident, exercise, audit, or pen test, conduct a lessons-learned review and track improvement actions to completion. This feeds back into all other functions. Build a culture where finding gaps is rewarded, not punished.
Access to physical and logical assets is limited to authorised users, services, and hardware and managed commensurate with the assessed risk of unauthorised access.
Key Subcategories
PR.AA-01: Identities and credentials for authorised users, services, and hardware are managed by the organisation
PR.AA-02: Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
PR.AA-03: Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
PR.AA-04: Identity assertions are protected, conveyed, and verified
PR.AA-05: Access permissions, entitlements, and authorisations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
PR.AA-06: Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk
Security Engineer Takeaway: Identity is the new perimeter. Deploy MFA everywhere (prefer FIDO2/WebAuthn), implement least-privilege access, conduct quarterly access reviews for privileged accounts, and work toward zero-trust architecture. PR.AA-06 reminds us that physical access control matters too — server rooms, network closets, and data centres need the same rigour as logical access.
PR.ATAwareness & TrainingImportant▶
The organisation's personnel are provided cybersecurity awareness and training so they can perform their cybersecurity-related duties.
Key Subcategories
PR.AT-01: Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
PR.AT-02: Individuals in specialised roles are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform relevant tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
Security Engineer Takeaway: One-size-fits-all training doesn't work. PR.AT-01 covers general awareness (phishing, passwords, social engineering) for all staff. PR.AT-02 is role-specific: secure coding for developers, cloud security for architects, IR procedures for SOC analysts, and risk management for executives. Run phishing simulations monthly and track metrics.
PR.DSData SecurityCore▶
Data are managed consistent with the organisation's risk strategy to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.
Key Subcategories
PR.DS-01: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
PR.DS-02: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-transit are protected
PR.DS-10: The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
PR.DS-11: Backups of data are created, protected, maintained, and tested
Security Engineer Takeaway: Data security is a core priority. Encrypt data at rest (AES-256), in transit (TLS 1.3), and explore confidential computing for data in use. PR.DS-11 on backups is critical for ransomware resilience: maintain 3-2-1 backup strategy (3 copies, 2 media types, 1 offsite), test restores quarterly, and ensure at least one copy is immutable/air-gapped.
PR.PSPlatform SecurityImportant▶
The hardware, software, and services of physical and virtual platforms are managed consistent with the organisation's risk strategy.
Key Subcategories
PR.PS-01: Configuration management practices are established and applied
PR.PS-02: Software is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
PR.PS-03: Hardware is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
PR.PS-04: Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
PR.PS-05: Installation and execution of unauthorised software are prevented
PR.PS-06: Secure software development practices are integrated, and their performance is monitored throughout the software development life cycle
Security Engineer Takeaway: PR.PS is the new consolidated category for platform hardening. Use CIS Benchmarks for baseline configurations, implement application allowlisting (PR.PS-05), maintain a patching cadence with SLAs (critical: 72h, high: 14d, medium: 30d), and integrate SAST/DAST into CI/CD pipelines (PR.PS-06). PR.PS-04 on logging is critical for feeding your SIEM and enabling detection.
Security architectures are managed with the organisation's risk strategy to protect asset confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and organisational resilience.
Key Subcategories
PR.IR-01: Networks and environments are protected from unauthorised logical access and usage
PR.IR-02: The organisation's technology assets are protected from environmental threats
PR.IR-03: Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
PR.IR-04: Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
Security Engineer Takeaway: Build for resilience, not just security. Network segmentation (PR.IR-01), environmental controls (PR.IR-02), redundancy and failover (PR.IR-03), and capacity planning (PR.IR-04) are all essential. Design your architecture assuming breach — microsegmentation limits blast radius, and resilience mechanisms ensure you can continue operations during an active incident.
Detect (DE) — 2 Categories
DE.CMContinuous MonitoringCore▶
Assets are monitored to find anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse events.
Key Subcategories
DE.CM-01: Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
DE.CM-02: The physical environment is monitored to find potentially adverse events
DE.CM-03: Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events
DE.CM-06: External service provider activities and services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
DE.CM-09: Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
Security Engineer Takeaway: Deploy layered monitoring: SIEM for log aggregation and correlation, EDR for endpoint visibility, NDR for network traffic analysis, and UEBA for anomalous behaviour detection. Don't forget to monitor third-party/cloud services (DE.CM-06). The goal is visibility across all attack surfaces — you can't respond to what you can't see.
DE.AEAdverse Event AnalysisImportant▶
Anomalies, indicators of compromise, and other potentially adverse events are analysed to characterise the events and detect cybersecurity incidents.
Key Subcategories
DE.AE-02: Potentially adverse events are analysed to better understand associated activities
DE.AE-03: Information is correlated from multiple sources
DE.AE-04: The estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood
DE.AE-06: Information on adverse events is provided to authorised staff and tools
DE.AE-07: Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis
DE.AE-08: Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
Security Engineer Takeaway: Analysis turns raw alerts into actionable incidents. Build correlation rules, integrate threat intelligence feeds (MITRE ATT&CK, ISACs), and establish clear incident declaration criteria (DE.AE-08). Key metrics: false positive rate, mean time from alert to triage, and percentage of alerts auto-resolved. Use SOAR platforms to automate repetitive analysis tasks and free analysts for complex investigations.
Respond (RS) — 4 Categories
RS.MAIncident ManagementCore▶
Responses to detected cybersecurity incidents are managed.
Key Subcategories
RS.MA-01: The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared
RS.MA-02: Incident reports are triaged and validated
RS.MA-03: Incidents are categorised and prioritised
RS.MA-04: Incidents are escalated or elevated as needed
RS.MA-05: The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
Security Engineer Takeaway: Your IR plan must be tested, not just documented. Conduct tabletop exercises quarterly and full-scale simulations annually. Key processes: triage (is it real?), categorisation (what type?), prioritisation (how urgent?), escalation (who needs to know?), and recovery initiation criteria (when do we shift from response to recovery?). Integrate regulatory reporting timelines (NIS2 24h, DORA 4h) into your escalation procedures.
RS.ANIncident AnalysisCore▶
Investigations are conducted to ensure effective response and support forensics and recovery activities.
Key Subcategories
RS.AN-03: Analysis is performed to establish what has taken place during an incident and the root cause of the incident
RS.AN-06: Actions performed during an investigation are recorded, and the records' integrity and provenance are preserved
RS.AN-07: Incident data and metadata are collected, and their integrity and provenance are preserved
RS.AN-08: An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated
Security Engineer Takeaway: Forensic readiness is key. Ensure you can collect and preserve evidence (memory dumps, disk images, network captures, logs) with chain-of-custody procedures. Use forensic tools that maintain evidence integrity. RS.AN-03 on root cause analysis should feed into ID.IM (Improvement) to prevent recurrence. Document everything — your investigation records may be required by regulators or law enforcement.
Response activities are coordinated with internal and external stakeholders as required by laws, regulations, or policies.
Key Subcategories
RS.CO-02: Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
RS.CO-03: Information is shared with designated internal and external stakeholders
Security Engineer Takeaway: Communication during incidents is often the weakest link. Prepare communication templates for different stakeholders: technical teams, management, customers, regulators, media. Know your regulatory reporting obligations cold: NIS2 (24h early warning), DORA (4h initial notification), GDPR (72h breach notification). Establish an out-of-band communication channel for when primary systems are compromised.
RS.MIIncident MitigationImportant▶
Activities are performed to prevent expansion of an event and mitigate its effects.
Key Subcategories
RS.MI-01: Incidents are contained
RS.MI-02: Incidents are eradicated
Security Engineer Takeaway: Containment and eradication are time-critical. Pre-define containment actions in your playbooks: network isolation, account disablement, endpoint quarantine, DNS sinkholing. For eradication: remove malware, patch exploited vulnerabilities, reset compromised credentials, and rebuild affected systems. Validate that containment is effective before declaring the incident contained.
Recover (RC) — 2 Categories
RC.RPIncident Recovery Plan ExecutionCore▶
Restoration activities are performed to ensure operational availability of systems and services affected by cybersecurity incidents.
Key Subcategories
RC.RP-01: The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
RC.RP-02: Recovery actions are selected, scoped, prioritised, and performed
RC.RP-03: The integrity of backups and other restoration assets is verified before using them for restoration
RC.RP-04: Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms
RC.RP-05: The integrity of restored assets is verified, systems and services are restored, and normal operating status is confirmed
RC.RP-06: The end of incident recovery is declared based on criteria, and incident-related documentation is completed
Security Engineer Takeaway: Recovery is where your DR plans are put to the test. RC.RP-03 is critical — verify backup integrity before restoring (attackers may have compromised backups). Define clear RTOs and RPOs for each critical service. RC.RP-05 reminds us to validate that restored systems are clean and functioning before returning to production. Always conduct a post-recovery verification to confirm the threat has been fully eradicated.
RC.COIncident Recovery CommunicationImportant▶
Restoration activities are coordinated with internal and external parties.
Key Subcategories
RC.CO-03: Recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities are communicated to designated internal and external stakeholders
RC.CO-04: Public updates on incident recovery are shared using approved methods and messaging
Security Engineer Takeaway: Transparent communication during recovery builds trust. Provide regular status updates to affected parties with estimated restoration timelines. For public-facing incidents, coordinate messaging with PR/communications teams and legal. RC.CO-04 acknowledges that public communication is often necessary — have pre-approved templates and a designated spokesperson ready.
Implementation Tiers & Profiles
CSF 2.0 provides two key mechanisms to tailor the framework: Implementation Tiers indicate the degree of rigour in cybersecurity risk management, and Profiles describe the desired cybersecurity posture.
The Four Implementation Tiers
Tier
Name
Risk Management Process
Integrated Risk Programme
External Participation
Tier 1
Partial
Ad hoc, reactive, not formalised
Limited awareness of risk at org level
Organisation does not understand its supply chain role
Tier 2
Risk Informed
Approved but not organisation-wide policy
Awareness at org level but not enterprise-wide
Understands its role but doesn't formalise participation
Tier 3
Repeatable
Formal, regularly updated, risk-informed
Enterprise-wide approach to risk management
Understands and acts upon relationships and dependencies
Tier 4
Adaptive
Adapts based on lessons learned and predictive indicators
Risk-informed culture with continuous improvement
Actively manages supply chain risks with real-time info sharing
Security Engineer Takeaway: Tiers are not maturity levels — NIST explicitly states that organisations should select the tier that meets their risk management goals. Not every organisation needs to be Tier 4. The key question is: does our current tier adequately manage our cybersecurity risks? Most organisations should target at least Tier 2 (Risk Informed) and strive for Tier 3 (Repeatable) for critical functions. Use tiers as a communication tool with leadership to explain where you are and where you need to be.
Framework Profiles
A Profile is a customised alignment of the CSF core to an organisation's specific requirements, risk tolerance, and resources.
Current Profile
Where are we today?
Documents the cybersecurity outcomes currently being achieved
Assessment of current state across all applicable subcategories
Based on evidence: policies, procedures, technical controls, audit results
Identifies what is and is not being done today
Target Profile
Where do we need to be?
Documents the desired cybersecurity outcomes
Informed by risk appetite, regulatory requirements, and business objectives
May incorporate community profiles (e.g., sector-specific profiles)
Sets measurable goals for each applicable subcategory
Gap Analysis
Current vs Target → Action Plan
Compare Current Profile against Target Profile
Identify gaps requiring action, resources, and budget
Prioritise gaps based on risk and organisational priorities
Develop a remediation roadmap with milestones and timelines
Community Profiles
New in CSF 2.0
Pre-built profiles for specific sectors, use cases, or regulations
Created by industry groups, regulators, or communities of interest
Examples: Critical Infrastructure, Small Business, Healthcare
Can be used as baseline Target Profiles and customised
Using Tiers and Profiles Together
Step
Activity
Output
1
Scope the target organisational profile based on mission, risk appetite, and regulatory requirements
Target Profile
2
Assess current state against the framework subcategories
Current Profile
3
Determine the appropriate tier for each category or overall
Tier Selection
4
Compare Current to Target and identify gaps
Gap Analysis
5
Prioritise gaps, allocate resources, and build a roadmap
Implementation Plan
6
Implement changes and measure progress over time
Continuous Improvement
Key Dates & Timeline
Important milestones in the evolution of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.
12 February 2013
Executive Order 13636
President Obama issues Executive Order 13636, "Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity," directing NIST to develop a cybersecurity framework.
12 February 2014
CSF 1.0 Published
NIST publishes version 1.0 of the Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. Five core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.
16 April 2018
CSF 1.1 Published
Version 1.1 adds self-assessment guidance, supply chain risk management category, clarifications on authentication and identity, and vulnerability disclosure lifecycle.
22 February 2022
CSF 2.0 Concept Paper
NIST publishes concept paper and Request for Information (RFI) for updating the CSF. Over 130 responses received from stakeholders.
8 August 2023
CSF 2.0 Public Draft
NIST releases the initial public draft of CSF 2.0 for public comment. Key addition: the Govern function as the 6th core function.
26 February 2024
CSF 2.0 Published
NIST publishes the final version of CSF 2.0. Major changes: new Govern function, expanded scope beyond critical infrastructure, Community Profiles, and Implementation Examples.
26 February 2024
CSF 2.0 Reference Tool Launched
NIST launches the CSF 2.0 Reference Tool, an online searchable catalogue of the framework core with implementation examples and informative references.
Ongoing
Community Profile Development
NIST and industry groups continue to develop sector-specific Community Profiles. Small Business Quick Start Guide and other resources continue to be released.
Implementation Checklist
Track your CSF 2.0 implementation progress. Checkmarks are saved locally in your browser.
Govern (GV)
Organisational mission and context documented and understood
Risk management strategy with risk appetite and tolerance statements established
Cybersecurity roles, responsibilities, and authorities clearly defined
Cybersecurity policy established, communicated, and enforced
Board-level oversight of cybersecurity risk management established
Supply chain risk management programme with supplier inventory in place
Cybersecurity requirements included in supplier contracts
Network segmentation and micro-segmentation implemented
Detect (DE)
SIEM deployed with log collection from all critical sources
EDR deployed on all endpoints
Network monitoring (NDR/IDS) operational
Alert correlation and triage processes established
Threat intelligence feeds integrated into detection tools
Incident declaration criteria defined and documented
Respond (RS)
Incident response plan documented, approved, and tested
IR tabletop exercises conducted quarterly
Forensic investigation capability established
Regulatory reporting templates and timelines documented
Containment and eradication playbooks pre-defined
Out-of-band communication channel established for crisis situations
Recover (RC)
Recovery plans tested at least annually (full DR exercise)
RTOs and RPOs defined and documented for critical services
Backup restoration procedures tested and verified
Recovery communication templates and stakeholder lists prepared
Post-incident review process with improvement tracking established
Who Uses NIST CSF 2.0?
CSF 2.0 is designed for all organisations, regardless of size, sector, or country. Unlike EU regulations (NIS2, DORA), CSF is voluntary. However, it is widely used as a de facto standard and is referenced by many regulatory frameworks.
Primary User Communities
Community
How They Use CSF
Key Driver
US Federal Agencies
Required by Executive Order (NIST RMF integrates with CSF)
Regulatory requirement
US Critical Infrastructure
Originally the primary audience; widely adopted across all 16 CI sectors
Best practice / Regulatory expectation
International Organisations
Used globally as a common cybersecurity language and benchmark
Best practice / Board reporting
Small & Medium Businesses
CSF 2.0 explicitly expanded scope; Small Business Quick Start Guide available
Risk management baseline
Healthcare
HIPAA crosswalk, Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices (HICP) aligned
Regulatory alignment
Financial Services
Used alongside FFIEC, SOC 2, DORA; CSF provides overarching framework
Multi-framework alignment
Technology Companies
SOC 2 / ISO 27001 mapping; customer assurance and trust reporting
Customer requirements
Education & Research
Framework for developing cybersecurity programmes at universities and labs
Grant requirements, best practice
Regulatory References to NIST CSF
US Executive Orders
Executive branch requirement
EO 13636 (2013): Directed NIST to create the framework
EO 14028 (2021): Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity
Federal agencies must align risk management with NIST frameworks
Sector-Specific Regulators
Various US agencies
NERC CIP (energy): Maps to CSF functions
FFIEC (banking): Assessment tool references CSF
HIPAA (healthcare): OCR recognises CSF alignment
FTC: Cites CSF in enforcement guidance
International Adoption
Global regulators and standards bodies
Japan: JPCERT/CC adapted CSF for Japanese context
Italy: Italian National Framework for Cybersecurity and Data Protection
Israel: Israeli National Cyber Directorate aligns with CSF
SOC 2: CSF categories map to trust service criteria
ISO 27001: NIST provides official crosswalk
CIS Controls: Mapped to CSF subcategories
COBIT: Governance framework integrated with CSF
Key Insight: While NIST CSF is voluntary, it has become a de facto standard globally. Many organisations use CSF as the "umbrella framework" to demonstrate compliance with multiple regulatory requirements simultaneously. If you're subject to NIS2, DORA, HIPAA, or SOC 2, a CSF-based programme can help you map controls across all of them.
Informative References & Mappings
CSF 2.0 provides extensive cross-references to other frameworks, standards, and guidelines. These help organisations align existing controls with CSF outcomes.
Official NIST Cross-References
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
Security and Privacy Controls
Comprehensive control catalogue with 20 families
Official CSF-to-800-53 mapping provided by NIST
Used by US federal agencies and many private sector organisations
Provides detailed implementation guidance for each control
Unlike NIS2 or DORA, NIST CSF is voluntary with no direct penalties. However, adoption is driven by regulatory expectations, customer requirements, and insurance considerations.
Regulatory Expectations
Indirect compliance driver
US federal agencies: effectively mandatory via OMB directives
Critical infrastructure: expected by sector regulators
FTC enforcement actions cite "reasonable security" aligned with CSF
Courts may use CSF as a "standard of care" benchmark
Business Drivers
Market and operational incentives
Customer and partner due diligence requirements
Board-level reporting using a recognised framework
Cyber insurance premium reductions for demonstrated adoption
M&A due diligence: CSF maturity assessment common
Global recognition reduces need for multiple frameworks
Adoption Statistics
Industry benchmarks
CSF is the most widely used cybersecurity framework globally
Adopted across 50+ countries and translated into multiple languages
Over 1 million downloads of CSF since initial publication
Referenced by major industry standards and regulatory bodies
CSF 2.0 expanded to explicitly include all organisations, not just CI
CSF vs. Mandatory Frameworks
Aspect
NIST CSF 2.0
NIS2
DORA
ISO 27001
Legal Status
Voluntary
Mandatory (EU Directive)
Mandatory (EU Regulation)
Voluntary (Certifiable)
Penalties
None
Up to EUR 10M / 2%
Per national law
Loss of certification
Enforcement Body
None
National competent authorities
Financial supervisors
Certification body
Who Must Comply
No one (but widely expected)
18 sectors, medium+
Financial entities
Organisations seeking certification
Key Benefit
Common language, flexibility
Legal certainty, harmonisation
Sector-specific rigour
Certification assurance
Complementary Use
Umbrella framework
Maps to CSF functions
Maps to CSF functions
Detailed control set
Security Engineer Takeaway: CSF 2.0 is the "Swiss Army knife" of cybersecurity frameworks. Even though it's voluntary, treat it as your foundational framework. Map your NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 controls to CSF categories, and you have a single source of truth. When regulators ask "what framework do you follow?", a CSF-aligned programme with crosswalks to applicable regulations is a strong answer. The new Govern function also gives you a framework-backed argument for board-level engagement and risk governance.
External Resources & References
Curated links to official documents, technical guidance, and tools. All links open in a new tab.
The full CSF 2.0 publication (NIST Cybersecurity White Paper 29). The authoritative framework document with all functions, categories, and subcategories.
Prioritised set of cybersecurity best practices. Strong alignment with CSF Protect and Detect functions. Good for prioritising technical implementation.
US federal agency providing cybersecurity guidance, alerts, and resources. Publishes KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) catalogue essential for vulnerability management.
Leading cybersecurity training and certification organisation. Provides CSF-aligned training, incident response resources, and CIS Controls development.
TrainingCommunity
Tip: The NIST CSF 2.0 Reference Tool is the best starting point for implementation. It provides searchable, filterable access to all functions, categories, subcategories, and implementation examples. Bookmark it: csrc.nist.gov/Projects/cybersecurity-framework
Search Results
🔍
Start typing in the search bar to find functions, categories, and keywords.